<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pundit.net &#187; Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pundit.net/category/business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pundit.net</link>
	<description>Politics, society, and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Donald Trump&#8217;s endorsement: Who cares?</title>
		<link>http://pundit.net/2012/02/02/donald-trumps-endorsement-who-cares/</link>
		<comments>http://pundit.net/2012/02/02/donald-trumps-endorsement-who-cares/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien Baldino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Idol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endorsements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Apprentice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.net/?p=1083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, Donald Trump announced that he will be endorsing Mitt Romney for President. Some were surprised that Trump didn&#8217;t choose Gingrich, and right up until the announcement, there was suspense over what he would announce. For the life of me, I can&#8217;t understand why anyone would care who Trump endorsed. Donald Trump is little more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1084" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 406px"><a href="http://pundit.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Donald-Trump-Melania-Knauss-endorsement.jpg" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fpundit.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F02%2FDonald-Trump-Melania-Knauss-endorsement.jpg','Donald-Trump-Melania-Knauss-endorsement')"><img src="http://pundit.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Donald-Trump-Melania-Knauss-endorsement.jpg" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fpundit.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F02%2FDonald-Trump-Melania-Knauss-endorsement.jpg','Donald-Trump-Melania-Knauss-endorsement')" alt="Donald Trump with his wife, Melania Knauss Trump" title="Donald-Trump-Melania-Knauss-endorsement" width="396" height="550" class="size-full wp-image-1084" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Donald Trump with his wife, Melania Knauss Trump</p></div>
<p>Today, Donald Trump announced that he will be endorsing Mitt Romney for President.  Some were surprised that Trump didn&#8217;t choose Gingrich, and right up until the announcement, there was suspense over what he would announce.  For the life of me, I can&#8217;t understand why anyone would care who Trump endorsed.</p>
<p>Donald Trump is little more than a reality star.  Does anyone care what the cast members of <em>Survivor</em>, <em>Big Brother</em>, or <em>American Idol</em> think about the election?<br />
<span id="more-1083"></span><br />
Sure, Trump mentioned the idea of running himself on numerous occasions, but decided against it.  In my opinion, it was nothing more than a ploy to get his name in the news and boost ratings for <em>The Apprentice</em>. The new season of The Apprentice begins in two weeks, so I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if this announcement were planned.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my guess: Donald Trump will find another &#8220;announcement&#8221; he has to make around the time of the season finale.  If Romney falters, he might also bring up the idea of running again.  Anything for ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pundit.net/2012/02/02/donald-trumps-endorsement-who-cares/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News Corp set to lose big on Myspace</title>
		<link>http://pundit.net/2011/06/29/news-corp-set-to-lose-big-on-myspace/</link>
		<comments>http://pundit.net/2011/06/29/news-corp-set-to-lose-big-on-myspace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien Baldino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.net/?p=1041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s News Corp. purchased Myspace in 2005 for $580 million. Six years later, the site is losing money, and is reportedly for sale. The price? Likely between $20 million and $30 million. That was a spectacular failure, if I&#8217;ve ever seen one. In 2005, Myspace had a huge advantage in the social networking market. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1042" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 470px"><a href="http://pundit.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/rupert-murdoch-myspace.jpg" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fpundit.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F06%2Frupert-murdoch-myspace.jpg','Rupert+Murdoch+News+Corp')"><img src="http://pundit.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/rupert-murdoch-myspace.jpg" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fpundit.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F06%2Frupert-murdoch-myspace.jpg','Rupert+Murdoch+News+Corp')" alt="Rupert Murdoch of News Corp" title="Rupert Murdoch News Corp" width="460" height="288" class="size-full wp-image-1042" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Rupert Murdoch seems confused when it comes to Myspace.</p></div>
<p>Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s News Corp. purchased Myspace in 2005 for $580 million.  Six years later, the site is losing money, and is <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/news-corp-verge-myspace-sale-wsj-213315852.html" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fnews.yahoo.com%2Fnews-corp-verge-myspace-sale-wsj-213315852.html','reportedly+for+sale')">reportedly for sale</a>.  The price?  Likely between $20 million and $30 million.  That was a spectacular failure, if I&#8217;ve ever seen one.</p>
<p>In 2005, Myspace had a huge advantage in the social networking market.  Now, it&#8217;s just a footnote in the short history of the industry. As I think about the sale of Myspace, I can&#8217;t help think about the AOL Time Warner merger.  That was another case of a traditional media company failing to blend with an online entity.  AOL still has a pulse, and has some potential for future growth.  As for Myspace, I hope the next owners are creative.<span id="more-1041"></span></p>
<p>The key to turning around the site will revolve around removing intrusive ads, becoming integrated with other sites, becoming mobile friendly, and finding the secret to reinventing the field it created.  Personally, i have my doubts.  If the new Myspace owners try it, Facebook has probably already thought of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pundit.net/2011/06/29/news-corp-set-to-lose-big-on-myspace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here comes the iPhone 4</title>
		<link>http://pundit.net/2010/06/07/here-comes-the-iphone-4/</link>
		<comments>http://pundit.net/2010/06/07/here-comes-the-iphone-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 02:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien Baldino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.net/?p=703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just when you thought the iPhone couldn&#8217;t get any better, it does. The new model will be slimmer, have expanded battery life, a front-facing camera for video conferencing, a 5 megapixel camera with flash, folders for apps, and high def resolution. If you&#8217;re a nerd, you probably want to get this ASAP. The new model [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     Just when you thought the iPhone couldn&#8217;t get any better, it does.  <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703303904575292703491815956.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052748703303904575292703491815956.html%3Fmod%3DWSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories','The+new+model')">The new model</a> will be slimmer, have expanded battery life, a front-facing camera for video conferencing, a 5 megapixel camera with flash, folders for apps, and high def resolution.  If you&#8217;re a nerd, you probably want to get this ASAP.</p>
<p>     The new model will be available on June 24th, and will be available in a 16gb model for $199, and a 32gb model for $299 (both with a 2 year contract).  To top it off, Netflix also announced a new app that will be available this summer, which will allow users to stream movies on their phone.  Unfortunately, the news isn&#8217;t all good.<span id="more-703"></span></p>
<p>     If you&#8217;ve been following tech news lately, then you know that AT&#038;T is going to eliminate their unlimited data packages.  That leaves new subscribers with a choice of a $15 package which includes 200mb of data, and a $25 package which allows 2gb of data.  AT&#038;T claims that the vast majority of its users are below the 2gb level, but with apps like Netflix, more people will undoubtedly be joining the 2gb+ club.  It&#8217;s unfortunate that AT&#038;T&#8217;s changes to its data plan has put a damper on Apple and Netflix&#8217;s good news and innovation.</p>
<p>     If you currently have an unlimited data plan, you will be allowed to keep it.  If you don&#8217;t, do your best to use wifi!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pundit.net/2010/06/07/here-comes-the-iphone-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Over-regulation isn&#8217;t necessary</title>
		<link>http://pundit.net/2010/01/27/over-regulation-isnt-necessary/</link>
		<comments>http://pundit.net/2010/01/27/over-regulation-isnt-necessary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LadyLumineux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.net/?p=477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama likes to take aim at &#8220;fat cat&#8221; bankers and Wall Street. Many members of Obama&#8217;s proletariat love it and thrive on any attempt to blame corporations for the current economic problems. Yet, there are two things that could have prevented the housing bubble and the current recession. 1. Not everyone should own a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     Barack Obama likes to take aim at &#8220;fat cat&#8221; bankers and Wall Street.  Many members of Obama&#8217;s proletariat love it and thrive on any attempt to blame corporations for the current economic problems.  Yet, there are two things that could have prevented the housing bubble and the current recession.</p>
<p><strong>1. Not everyone should own a home.</strong></p>
<p>     Many will find this statement appalling.  After all, isn&#8217;t home ownership the American Dream?  The problem is that the federal government encouraged home ownership and encouraged relaxed lending standards, which allowed unqualified buyers to receive mortgages.  Many of these loans had adjustable rates, didn&#8217;t require documentation, or required no money down.  Is it any wonder that banks were overwhelmed with bad loans?<span id="more-477"></span></p>
<p>     This leaves us with another problem: Escalating prices.  Once you make it easy for borrowers to get money, you increase the supply of buyers.  If the housing inventory doesn&#8217;t keep up, prices will rise.  As a result, you having rising home prices being brought about by a federal government which haphazardly encourage banks to lend, and banks foolish enough to go along with the feds.  Of course, this isn&#8217;t the only problem.</p>
<p><strong>2.  Force banks to take responsibilty for their loans.</strong></p>
<p>     I&#8217;m not a fan of over-regulation, but one simple rule could have prevented most of the problems we are encountering in the housing sector: Force banks to keep loans they originate on their books for at least 5 years.  </p>
<p>     As you may know, many banks would originate loans, collect the fees, then sell them shortly after.  Why would the banks care if the borrower was on shaky financial ground?  All they had to do was keep churning out loans like a mortgage factory, and their profits would keep increasing.  By forcing banks to keep loans on their books for at least 5 years, you ensure that banks will do their due dilligence and believe the borrower will be able to make payments regularly.  Since many foreclosures happen within the first two or three years, this is a good way to ensure that loans aren&#8217;t being quickly sold off and securitized.</p>
<p>     There&#8217;s no doubt that less interference by the government and more responsibility from banks could have averted the current economic crisis.  It could have also been averted if borrowers had used some common sense by realizing they couldn&#8217;t afford large mortgages and actually understood the terms of their loans.  Of course, in today&#8217;s America, expecting people to take responsibility for their actions seems unacceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pundit.net/2010/01/27/over-regulation-isnt-necessary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple introduces the iPad</title>
		<link>http://pundit.net/2010/01/27/apple-introduces-the-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://pundit.net/2010/01/27/apple-introduces-the-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LadyLumineux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.net/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s official: Apple has introduced the iPad. The Apple iPad is a tablet PC with a 10 inch screen, which basically functions like the apple iPod, only bigger. The iPad will have either 16gb, 32gb, or 64gb of storage. Most impressive is the battery life, which is rated at 10 hours, with 30 days of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     It&#8217;s official: <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31021_3-10440943-260.html?tag=smallCarouselArea.0" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fnews.cnet.com%2F8301-31021_3-10440943-260.html%3Ftag%3DsmallCarouselArea.0','Apple+has+introduced+the+iPad')">Apple has introduced the iPad</a>.  The Apple iPad is a tablet PC with a 10 inch screen, which basically functions like the apple iPod, only bigger.  The iPad will have either 16gb, 32gb, or 64gb of storage.  Most impressive is the battery life, which is rated at 10 hours, with 30 days of stand-by time.</p>
<p>     During the announcement, Steve Jobs spoke about how the iPad fills a void between the iPod/iPhone, and a typical notebook computer.  He also criticized netbooks as cheap laptops.   There&#8217;s no doubt the iPad will be a huge success, especially for people who want it for media or entertainment purposes.  The larger screen is superior to netbooks for movies, viewing pictures, and games.  Of course, there are always going to be people who want to push actual buttons especially when typing a paper or writing an e-mail.<span id="more-473"></span></p>
<p>     So, how much does this cost?  The 16gb model will sell for $499, 32gb for $599, and 64gb for $699.  Unfortunately, those aren&#8217;t 3g models.  If you want to add 3g, you&#8217;re looking at another $130, which boosts the prices to $629, $729, and $829.  There is also a keyboard adapter and stand, for those who anticipate doing a lot of typing.  The iPad looks like a fun gadget, but do you really want to spend almost $1,000 for a &#8220;computer&#8221; with just 64gb of storage?</p>
<p>     I would like to have an iPad, but at the current price and specifications, I think I&#8217;ll wait.  It&#8217;s a great entertainment device, but not too impressive when work-related tasks are taken into consideration.  As someone who uses a 17&#8243; laptop for work and a 10&#8243; laptop when i&#8217;m on the road, I don&#8217;t see the benefit of spending the extra money for the iPad.  With a 250gb hard drive, bluetooth, 10 inch screen, 9 hours of battery life and a $360 price tag, I think I&#8217;ll keep my &#8220;cheap&#8221; netbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pundit.net/2010/01/27/apple-introduces-the-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good riddance to Air America</title>
		<link>http://pundit.net/2010/01/22/good-riddance-to-air-america/</link>
		<comments>http://pundit.net/2010/01/22/good-riddance-to-air-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LadyLumineux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liquidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talk Radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.net/?p=464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Air America, we hardly knew ya! After less than 6 years, the liberal radio network was forced to file for chapter 7 bankruptcy. If you didn&#8217;t listen to Air America, don&#8217;t feel bad, not many people did. When I heard the news, I couldn&#8217;t help but laugh. Liberals like Rhode Island Senator Sheldon Whitehouse like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     Air America, we hardly knew ya!  After less than 6 years, the liberal radio network was forced to file for <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100122/ap_on_en_ot/us_air_america_bankruptcy" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fnews.yahoo.com%2Fs%2Fap%2F20100122%2Fap_on_en_ot%2Fus_air_america_bankruptcy','chapter+7+bankruptcy')">chapter 7 bankruptcy</a>.  If you didn&#8217;t listen to Air America, don&#8217;t feel bad, not many people did.</p>
<p>     When I heard the news, I couldn&#8217;t help but laugh.  Liberals like <a href="http://pundit.net/2009/12/20/sheldon-whitehouses-ingnorant-rant-who-is-really-a-member-of-the-lunatic-fringe/" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fpundit.net%2F2009%2F12%2F20%2Fsheldon-whitehouses-ingnorant-rant-who-is-really-a-member-of-the-lunatic-fringe%2F','Rhode+Island+Senator+Sheldon+Whitehouse')">Rhode Island Senator Sheldon Whitehouse</a> like to refer to conservatives as the &#8220;lunatic fringe,&#8221; but isn&#8217;t Air America&#8217;s bankruptcy evidence that the exact opposite is true?<span id="more-464"></span><!--more--></p>
<p>     The big names on Air America were Al Franken and Rachel Maddow, who now has a show on MSNBC.  If you look at the ratings, MSNBC&#8217;s liberal shows hosted by Maddow, Keith Olbermann, and others are way behind behind the conservative shows aired by Fox news.  Sean Hanitty, Bill O&#8217;Reilly, and Glenn Beck are always near the top, while MSNBC&#8217;s cast of characters are near the bottom.  Let&#8217;s  not forget that those hosts also have radio shows, along with others like Michael Savage, Mark Levin, and Rush Limbaugh.  The conservative hosts are still working and thriving, while the liberal network collapsed.  What does that tell you about the opinions of typical Americans?</p>
<p>     Liberals enjoy attempting to marginalize conservatives, but when they do so, they accomplish nothing but illustrating that they are out of touch with reality.  They conveniently ignore the millions of American that are conservative and listen to these programs, just as they write off the people who attend Tea Party rallies and town hall meetings.  </p>
<p>     Maybe they think Americans will start to believe their lies about the &#8220;lunatic fringe&#8221; if they repeat them enough.  Personally, the surge among Republican candidates and conservative commentators tell me that the &#8220;lunatic fringe&#8221; is actually on the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pundit.net/2010/01/22/good-riddance-to-air-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s official: Google&#8217;s Nexus One is on the wa</title>
		<link>http://pundit.net/2010/01/05/its-official-googles-nexus-one-is-on-the-wa/</link>
		<comments>http://pundit.net/2010/01/05/its-official-googles-nexus-one-is-on-the-wa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien Baldino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nexus One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.net/?p=435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s official: Google is now in the cell phone business. The company announced the release of the Nexus One, which was completely designed by its own engineers, and will help it gain traction in online advertising. I&#8217;m not sure how the Nexus One stacks up to the iPhone, but there&#8217;s no doubt it is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     It&#8217;s official: <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Google-confirms-plans-to-sell-apf-1575050503.html?x=0&#038;sec=topStories&#038;pos=1&#038;asset=&#038;ccode=" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Ffinance.yahoo.com%2Fnews%2FGoogle-confirms-plans-to-sell-apf-1575050503.html%3Fx%3D0%26sec%3DtopStories%26pos%3D1%26asset%3D%26ccode%3D','Google+is+now+in+the+cell+phone+business')">Google is now in the cell phone business</a>.  The company announced the release of the Nexus One, which was completely designed by its own engineers, and will help it gain traction in online advertising.</p>
<p>     I&#8217;m not sure how the Nexus One stacks up to the iPhone, but there&#8217;s no doubt it is a game-changer for the wireless industry.  Those who purchase the phone can buy an unlocked version that can be used with any carrier.  Of course, that will be pricey, since the initial price will be $529.  For those who are a bit more frugal, there is also an option of signing up for a 2 year agreement with T-Mobile and paying just $179.<span id="more-435"></span></p>
<p>     I don&#8217;t see myself paying more than $500 for a phone, but a trend toward unlocked phones is certainly a positive for consumers.  As for Google, this is definitely a big step for the company.  Do you remember when they were just a search engine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pundit.net/2010/01/05/its-official-googles-nexus-one-is-on-the-wa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GM and Chrysler could learn from Ford</title>
		<link>http://pundit.net/2010/01/02/gm-and-chrysler-could-learn-from-ford/</link>
		<comments>http://pundit.net/2010/01/02/gm-and-chrysler-could-learn-from-ford/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 21:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien Baldino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.net/?p=433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ford recently announced that its Sync system will soon allow customers to plug in a modem, so that passengers will be able to access broadband internet. Basically, many of Ford&#8217;s cars will become rolling hot spots. This is in addition to Sync, which allows you to control many of the car&#8217;s features with your voice. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     Ford recently announced that its Sync system will soon allow customers to plug in a modem, so that passengers will be able to access <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10419548-94.html?tag=TOCmoreStories.0" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fnews.cnet.com%2F8301-1035_3-10419548-94.html%3Ftag%3DTOCmoreStories.0','broadband+internet')">broadband internet</a>.  Basically, many of Ford&#8217;s cars will become rolling hot spots.  This is in addition to Sync, which allows you to control many of the car&#8217;s features with your voice.</p>
<p>     Ford&#8217;s recent innovations seem to be far ahead of both Chrysler and GM.  Is it merely a coincidence that the most innovative American car company is also the only one that is profitable and wasn&#8217;t bailed out by the federal government?  Perhaps GM and Chrysler should take notes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pundit.net/2010/01/02/gm-and-chrysler-could-learn-from-ford/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama gets tough with &#8220;fat cat bankers&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://pundit.net/2009/12/14/barack-obama-gets-tough-with-fat-cat-bankers/</link>
		<comments>http://pundit.net/2009/12/14/barack-obama-gets-tough-with-fat-cat-bankers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien Baldino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.net/?p=391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama met with 12 &#8220;fat cat bankers,&#8221; who he largely blames for the recession. After criticizing them for risky behavior which contributed to the nation&#8217;s economic problems, he said, &#8220;And so I urged these institutions here today to go back and take a third and fourth look about how they are operating when it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     Barack Obama met with 12 <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34416646/ns/business-us_business" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msnbc.msn.com%2Fid%2F34416646%2Fns%2Fbusiness-us_business','%22fat+cat+bankers%2C%22')">&#8220;fat cat bankers,&#8221;</a> who he largely blames for the recession.  After criticizing them for risky behavior which contributed to the nation&#8217;s economic problems, he said,</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;And so I urged these institutions here today to go back and take a third and fourth look about how they are operating when it comes to small business and medium-sized business lending,&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-391"></span></p>
<p>     Unfortunately, this might not be possible.  Due to the problems of the past two years, regulators have been keeping a closer eye on banks.  Even if banks were able to safely lend substantially more, is it wise?  Is taking a &#8220;third or fourth look&#8221; at a business that was too weak to make it by earlier screenings worth a shot in this precarious economy?  Wouldn&#8217;t a large number of these loans put the banks stability in question?</p>
<p>     Of course, Barack Obama probably doesn&#8217;t care much about the details.  He wants to be seen criticizing the big bad banks, and wants the economy to pick up at any cost, even if what is built is no stronger than a house of cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pundit.net/2009/12/14/barack-obama-gets-tough-with-fat-cat-bankers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Google Phone on the way?</title>
		<link>http://pundit.net/2009/12/13/is-the-google-phone-on-the-way/</link>
		<comments>http://pundit.net/2009/12/13/is-the-google-phone-on-the-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien Baldino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nexus One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.net/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are rumors circulating that a Google Phone (possibly named Nexus One) could be on the way by January 2010. The phone will run Android 2.1 and be manufactured by HTC, but will carry the Google name. The phone could be a game-changer in many ways. For one thing, the phone will be unlocked, so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     There are rumors circulating that a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/13/AR2009121301694.html" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fwp-dyn%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F2009%2F12%2F13%2FAR2009121301694.html','Google+Phone')">Google Phone</a> (possibly named Nexus One) could be on the way by January 2010.  The phone will run Android 2.1 and be manufactured by HTC, but will carry the Google name.</p>
<p>     The phone could be a game-changer in many ways.  For one thing, the phone will be unlocked, so it can be used on both AT&#038;T&#8217;s and T-Mobile&#8217;s network.  It will also be sold in retail locations, and with the iPhone&#8217;s exclusivity agreement with AT&#038;T about to expire, it could open up a potentially interesting competition.  As for features, it will have a touch screen, two microphones, and voice-to-text, for those who don&#8217;t like typing on a touch screen.<span id="more-381"></span></p>
<p>     This could really heat up competition with the iPhone, and possibly change the marketplace for cell phones.  Right now, phones are typically purchased at a carrier&#8217;s store and linked to their service.  With this business model, the purchase of the device and the service are separated in a way which should encourage competition and encourage other equipment makers to give this model a shot.</p>
<p>     There&#8217;s no question the Google Phone has the potential to be revolutionary from a technological perspective, but its greatest impact could be on the cell phone industry&#8217;s business model</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pundit.net/2009/12/13/is-the-google-phone-on-the-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

