Posts Tagged ‘Barack Obama’
» posted on Saturday, March 20th, 2010 at 12:14 pm by LadyLumineux
Barack Obama’s approval rating in limbo: How low will it go?

How low will Barack Obama's approval rating go?
The latest Rasmussen Poll finds that 23% of Americans strongly approve of the job Barack Obama is doing, while 44% strongly disapprove. Rasmussen also points out that the President’s approval rating drops when he pushes the health care bill. I’m not an expert, but do you think that means that most people are against the current health care reform bill? Not surprisingly, Rasmussen also found that 50% of Americans are less likely to vote for a Congressmen who supports health care reform.
It looks like conservatives won’t have to worry about throwing out the leftists in 2010 and 2012. They’re going to take care of that all by themselves. I just hope they don’t wreck the place too much before then.
post a comment | filed under Health · Politics | tags: Approval Rating, Barack Obama, Congress, Health Care Reform, Rasmussen Reports
» posted on Saturday, March 20th, 2010 at 11:54 am by LadyLumineux
So much for deficit reduction: CBO says health care bill will be $59 billion in the red
Do you remember how Democrats (rightly) criticized Republicans for passing a prescription drug plan that added to the deficit? Democrats criticized their irresponsible behavior and vowed that health care reform would not only be deficit neutral, but that it would also reduce the deficit. Well, now it looks like the Democrats are being exposed as the hypocrites they are. The Congressional Budget Office found that the proposal would be $59 billion in the red. I can’t to hear how Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Barack Obama will spin this latest piece of news.
post a comment | filed under Health · Politics · Uncategorized | tags: Barack Obama, CBO, Congressional Budget Office, Harry Reid, Health Care Reform, Nancy Pelosi, National Deficit
» posted on Friday, March 19th, 2010 at 11:46 am by LadyLumineux
Impeach Barack Obama?

Barack Obama as The Joker. I'm not laughing.
Washington Times writer Jeffrey Kuhner has an interesting column, where he argues that Barack Obama and his gang of leftists should be impeached. Here is an excerpt from Mr. Kuhner’s column:
Mr. Obama is willing to devour his presidency, his party’s congressional majority and – most disturbing – our democratic institutional safeguards to enact it. He is a reckless ideologue who is willing to sacrifice the country’s stability in pursuit of a socialist utopia.
The Slaughter Solution is a poisoned chalice. By drinking from it, the Democrats would not only commit political suicide. They would guarantee that any bill signed by Mr. Obama is illegitimate, illegal and blatantly unconstitutional. It would be worse than a strategic blunder; it would be a crime – a moral crime against the American people and a direct abrogation of the Constitution and our very democracy. » read more
post a comment | filed under Health · Politics | tags: Barack Obama, Deeming, Harry Reid, Health Care, Impeachment, Louise Slaughter, Nancy Pelosi, Slaughter Rule
» posted on Thursday, March 18th, 2010 at 8:06 pm by LadyLumineux
Thank you Mark Levin

Mark Levin on the cover of his latest book.
I’d like to thank talk show host Mark Levin and the Landmark Legal Foundation, who are working hard to ensure that Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Barack Obama don’t trample over the constitution any more than they already have. If the House uses the “Slaugher Rule” to pass the health care bill this weekend, it will be facing a serious court challenge. To read more about the potential lawsuit, go to Mark Levin’s website.
post a comment | filed under Health · Politics | tags: Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Health Care Bill, Landmark Legal Foundation, Mark Levin, Nancy Pelosi, Slaughter Rule
» posted on Thursday, March 18th, 2010 at 7:59 pm by LadyLumineux
Chuck Schumer and Lindsey Graham offer an immigration reform plan that will be a miserable failure

Dumb and Dumber: Senators Chuck Schumer and Lindsey Graham
Barack Obama announced his support for a comprehensive immigration reform bill being sponsored by Senators Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. and Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. Here are some details of the bill:
* Illegal aliens must admit they broke the law
* Pay a fine and back taxes
* Perform community service
* Pass background checks
* Be proficient in English
* Grant legal status to those who receive a masters degree or doctorate from a U.S. university
* Zero tolerance for illegal aliens who commit crimes
* Flexible system which bring in more immigrants when the economy is strong, and fewer during a recession
* Require all U.S. citizens to get a new Social Security card with built in biometrics » read more
post a comment | filed under Illegal Immigration · Politics | tags: Barack Obama, Chuck Schumer, Comprehensive Immigration Reform, E-Verify, English, Illegal Aliens, Illegal Immigrants, Lindsey Graham
» posted on Wednesday, March 17th, 2010 at 11:49 am by LadyLumineux
New Gallup poll is bad news for Barack Obama

Barack Obama's approval rating continues to drop.
The latest Gallup Poll shows that more Americans disapprove of Barack Obama’s performance than approve. The poll shows that 47% of Americans disapprove of his performance, while just 46% approve. This is just the latest sign of the slow erosion of the President’s support.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see Barack Obama’s approval rating drop into the high 30% range. If the health care bill passes, especially without being voted on by the House, his approval rating will take a massive hit. This will only be compounded once debates start on immigration reform. » read more
post a comment | filed under Illegal Immigration · Politics | tags: 2010, 2012, Approval Rating, Barack Obama, Health Care, Immigration Reform, Terrorism
» posted on Sunday, March 14th, 2010 at 5:09 pm by LadyLumineux
David Axelrod seems fine with illegal aliens receiving health care
In yet another bit of hypocrisy, Barack Obama’s senior adviser, David Axelrod went on CNN’s “State of the Union” to discuss the health care bill. During his appearance, he criticized addressing illegal immigration and abortion in the health care bill:
“The president’s view is that this is not the vehicle to address immigration issues…this is not the place for this, this is not the place to resolve disputes over abortion,” he said. “I believe that as the week goes on, these issues will clarify themselves…We have to resolve the larger questions, which is the status of undocumented workers…we can’t resolve it within the context of this debate.”
Axelrod’s words might have had some credibility if the health care bill weren’t being used to expand the federal government’s role in higher education. Student loans have nothing to do with health care, yet they are part of the debate. On the other hand, the debates surrounding illegal immigration and abortion concern who is eligible for benefits and what procedures are covered. The last time I checked, those were both central issues that would need to be discussed in any reform plan.
In regards to the undocumented workers illegal aliens David Axelrod referred to, his position is a harbinger of things to come. By ignoring any prohibition on illegal aliens, he’s essentially hoping to extend benefits to the law-breakers. Maybe I’m wrong, but wouldn’t health care costs be reduced if we deported the 12 million or so illegal aliens who burden the United states financially?
post a comment | filed under Health · Illegal Immigration · Politics | tags: Abortion, Barack Obama, David Axelrod, Health Care, Higher Education, Illegal Immigration
» posted on Friday, March 12th, 2010 at 5:42 pm by LadyLumineux
Health care vote coming next week
The health care bill is on pace to have a vote in the House by next week. Until this point, debate has focused on a public option, the Stupak Amendment, and bribes favors given to certain Senators to secure their vote. Now, it looks like the latest disagreement might revolve around student loans. Yes, you read correctly, student loans.
You might be wondering what student loans have to do with the health care bill. If you can’t figure out how they are related, don’t feel bad, they have nothing to do with each other. Democrats are simply trying to tack on changes to the student loan program which would cut out the banks, have the government originate the loans, then use the savings to increase Pell Grants. » read more
post a comment | filed under Health · Politics | tags: Barack Obama, Health Care, Nancy Pelosi, Student Loans
» posted on Friday, January 29th, 2010 at 6:22 pm by LadyLumineux
Fighting the BCS: Bipartisan stupidity
Anyone with a passing knowledge of college football knows that the BCS is ridiculous. Think about this: Some undefeated teams don’t get a shot at the Championship. It’s a disgrace, and all football fans should voice their displeasure. Unfortunately, some of those fans are elected officials.
Both Barack Obama and Utah Senator Orrin Hatch are football fans upset with the current playoff system. As a result, they’ve used their position to bring about change. Hatch has requested that the Department of Justice perform an antitrust review, and they have agreed. Not surprising, since Barack Obama complained about the playoff structure just after his election. » read more
post a comment | filed under Politics · Sports | tags: Barack Obama, BCS, Bowl Games, College Football, Football, Orrin Hatch, Playoffs
» posted on Wednesday, January 27th, 2010 at 5:16 pm by LadyLumineux
Over-regulation isn’t necessary
Barack Obama likes to take aim at “fat cat” bankers and Wall Street. Many members of Obama’s proletariat love it and thrive on any attempt to blame corporations for the current economic problems. Yet, there are two things that could have prevented the housing bubble and the current recession.
1. Not everyone should own a home.
Many will find this statement appalling. After all, isn’t home ownership the American Dream? The problem is that the federal government encouraged home ownership and encouraged relaxed lending standards, which allowed unqualified buyers to receive mortgages. Many of these loans had adjustable rates, didn’t require documentation, or required no money down. Is it any wonder that banks were overwhelmed with bad loans? » read more
post a comment | filed under Business · Economy · Politics | tags: Banks, Barack Obama, Housing, Mortgages, Personal Responsibility, Recession
» posted on Friday, January 22nd, 2010 at 1:35 pm by LadyLumineux
Barack Obama’s approval rating drops and he’s taking fellow Democrats with him
How low will Barack Obama go? If you check out the latest poll by Rasmussen and follow the trends, it looks like the President’s downward spiral is continuing to pick up steam. The latest Presidential tracking poll shows that 25% of Americans strongly approve of the President’s performance, while 43% strongly disapprove. Overall, just 45% approve of the job Barack Obama is doing, while 54% disapprove.
The same poll found that nearly half of Americans believe GM will need another bailout, 61% believe Congress should drop healthcare reform, and 66% believe the country is heading in the wrong direction. It doesn’t look like American’s are fond of the Obama agenda. » read more
post a comment | filed under Health · Politics | tags: Approval Rating, Bailout, Barack Obama, GM, Health Care, Rasmussen Poll
» posted on Friday, January 22nd, 2010 at 8:58 am by LadyLumineux
Scott Brown for President? Not yet
I was glad to see Scott Brown defeat Martha Coakley in a recent election for “Teddy Kennedy’s seat.” His win in such an overwhelmingly number of Democrats state shows how fed up many Americans are with Barack Obama and Congress. As the 41st Republican vote, Brown’s presence will force Democrats to actually make a real attempt at bipartisanship. What a novel concept!
There’s no doubt that Scott Brown’s win was impressive, and his presence has drastically altered the political landscape in Washington. If you’re a conservative, it was certainly an exciting win, but it seems like some of us are getting carried away by questioning whether Brown might run for President.
By the time the 2012 elections roll around, Brown will have had less than 3 years in office as a Senator. I’d prefer to see a deeper resume for a Presidential candidate. You might argue that Barack Obama had a similar resume when he ran in 2008. You would be correct, but let’s not forget one point: He’s a lousy President.
post a comment | filed under Politics | tags: 2012 Election, Barack Obama, Massachusetts, President, Scott Brown
» posted on Tuesday, January 19th, 2010 at 7:56 pm by Damien Baldino
Scott Brown defeats Martha Coakley and the Democrats
The unthinkable has happened. Just two weeks ago, Massachusetts State senator Scott Brown trailed Martha Coakley by nearly 30 points in the polls. He was gradually able to narrow that margin, and now he is the newest member of the United States Senate. This is a groundbreaking moment for Massachusetts and the nation.
From the beginning, Scott Brown said he would vote against Obamacare, and would be the 61st Senator needed to stop the Democrats. The fact that this message resonated with one of the bluest states in the country illustrates the level of discontent with Congress and Barack Obama. This is just the latest loss for the Democrats. You might recall the huge losses for the Democrats in the November 2009 elections when both Virgina and New Jersey elected Republican governors. Some felt that those elections weren’t really much of a barometer for national sentiment. However, Scott Brown’s win leaves no doubt that the Republican party has the momentum. » read more
post a comment | filed under Health · Politics | tags: Barack Obama, Democrats, Harry Reid, Martha Coakley, Massachusetts, Nancy Pelosi, Republicans, Scott Brown, Senate
» posted on Wednesday, January 6th, 2010 at 9:08 pm by Damien Baldino
Barack Obama’s credibility continues to take a hit
In the past few days, Barack Obama has managed to break not one, but two campaign promises. The first involved his promise to have health care negotiations televised on C-Span to ensure transparency. His second was a meeting with House leaders, where he urged them to support a tax on high-end health insurance plans. Many of these plans are owned by the middle class, a group he vowed not to tax.
As far as televising negotiations, Barack Obama really doesn’t have the authority to promise such a thing. It made a great sound byte, but in the end, it was just another empty promise. With that said, he could have at least publicly expressed a desire to have a more open process. It probably wouldn’t have accomplished much, but at least it would have made him appear consistent and show that he cares about transparency. As for the tax on health plans, that’s another story. » read more
post a comment | filed under Health · Politics | tags: Barack Obama, C-Span, Health Care
» posted on Thursday, December 31st, 2009 at 4:06 pm by Damien Baldino
Eric Massa versus Dick Cheney
Rep. Eric Massa (D-N.Y.) has challenged former Vice President Dick Cheney to a debate. Massa’s challenge came as he complained about being sick of Cheney “kicking us in the shins,” and saying that he “suffers from a horrible case of political Tourette’s”. The most telling part of his rant came when he decided to present himself as Barack Obama’s political bodyguard:
“I don’t want the president being diverted from his mission on this, having to deal with Dick Cheney. I want Dick Cheney debate me, anywhere, anytime, anyhow. And let’s see how he stands up to the truth.”
He doesn’t want the President to be diverted by Dick Cheney. Does that mean that he’s afraid the President would some how be swayed by Cheney’s argument, or intimidated into doing the right thing? Well, if that’s the case, have no fear because Eric Massa is here! By the way, if Eric Massa thinks Barack Obama could be so easily “diverted” by the comments of a private citizen, then what does that say about his perceived leadership skills? » read more
post a comment | filed under Politics | tags: Barack Obama, Debate, Dick Cheney, Eric Massa
» posted on Thursday, December 31st, 2009 at 1:34 pm by Damien Baldino
Barack Obama: The new Neville Chamberlain
I recently had a discussion with someone about the Republican party. He told me that he had been a registered Republican for years, but left the party while George W. Bush was President. We both agreed that George W. Bush had strayed from various Republican principles, such as fiscal conservatism, and were generally unhappy with his performance. The propensity of the Bush Administration to run-up the deficit and the national debt were maddening, but with most things, there were accomplishments that were not fully appreciated.
George W. Bush’s greatest achievement was helping to keep the United States safe after 9/11. Critics like to take aim at Guantanamo Bay, the Patriot Act, and The War on Terror in general, but his success in keeping the country safe cannot be disputed. There were attempts to attack the U.S. since 9/11, which were thwarted, and I’m sure there were many more attempts which were stopped early on in the planning process. For that, we owe the Bush Administration our gratitude. » read more
post a comment | filed under Politics · Terrorism | tags: Barack Obama, Dick Cheney, Neville Chamberlain, Terrorism, Winston Churchill
» posted on Sunday, December 20th, 2009 at 10:21 pm by Damien Baldino
Sheldon Whitehouse’s ingnorant rant: Who is really a member of “the lunatic fringe”?
If you are in Washington, D.C. and talk about the simpleton from Rhode Island, you might automatically think of Patrick Kennedy. However, we can’t forget that Rhode Island has another simpleton in D.C.: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse. In case you think my categorization is merely a partisan shot, it isn’t. While I disagree with other Democratic politicians, I wouldn’t question their intelligence. I would just recognize the fact that we see the issues differently. With Senator Whitehouse, there is a certain shallowness to his thinking, tinged with hyper-partisanship, and a heaping helping of smarminess.
There have been many comments over the years which reinforced my opinion of him, but his latest speech on health care reform illustrates his failings perfectly:
“Voting ‘no’ and hiding from the vote are the same result. Those of us on the floor see it. It was clear the three of them who did not cast their yes votes until all 60 Senate votes had been tallied and it was clear that the result was a foregone conclusion. And why? Why all this discord and discourtesy, all this unprecedented destructive action? All to break the momentum of our new young president.
They are desperate to break this president. They have ardent supporters who are nearly hysterical at the very election of President Barack Obama. The birthers, the fanatics, the people running around in right-wing militia and Aryan support groups, it is unbearable to them that President Barack Obama should exist. That is one powerful reason. It is not the only one.” » read more
one Comment | filed under Health · Politics | tags: Barack Obama, Ben Nelson, Health Care, Racism, Sheldon Whitehouse
» posted on Wednesday, December 16th, 2009 at 7:27 pm by Damien Baldino
Barack Obama thinks the federal government will go bankrupt without health care reform
Yes, you read the title of the post correctly. Barack Obama believes that without health care reform, the federal government will go bankrupt. Here is an excerpt:
The president said that the costs of Medicare and Medicaid are on an “unsustainable” trajectory and if there is no action taken to bring them down, “the federal government will go bankrupt.”
I’m not an economist, but that seems like a bit of an exagerration to me. The President’s comments about Medicare and Medicaid also make me wonder why we would want to expand Medicare enrollment to those ages 55 to 64. If we already have a massive federal program facing serious financial challenges, then why would we want to expand it? Wouldn’t we just be making a bigger problem for ourselves? » read more
post a comment | filed under Economy · Politics | tags: Barack Obama, Health Care
» posted on Monday, December 14th, 2009 at 5:08 pm by Damien Baldino
Time “Person of the Year”: The finalists
Time magazine is set to announce its “Person of the Year” on Wednesday. So far, here are the finallists: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, President Barack Obama, General Stanley McChrystal, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, Apple CEO Steve Jobs, Jamaican sprinter Usain Bolt, and the Chinese worker. Not much to choose from, is there?
If we were choosing based solely on cool names, I’d go with Usain Bolt. After all, what’s cooler that a sprinter named Bolt? If I had to guess, I’d say Barack Obama will be the winner. I’m not saying he deserves it, but he is the darling of the media. Plus, he didn’t deserve the Nobel Peace Prize, but look how well that turned out for him!
post a comment | filed under Media | tags: Barack Obama, Ben Bernanke, Chinese Worker, Person of the year, Stanley McChrystal, Steve Jobs, Time Magazine, Usain Bolt
» posted on Monday, December 14th, 2009 at 4:48 pm by Damien Baldino
Barack Obama gets tough with “fat cat bankers”
Barack Obama met with 12 “fat cat bankers,” who he largely blames for the recession. After criticizing them for risky behavior which contributed to the nation’s economic problems, he said,
“And so I urged these institutions here today to go back and take a third and fourth look about how they are operating when it comes to small business and medium-sized business lending,”
post a comment | filed under Business · Economy · Politics | tags: Banks, Barack Obama, Lending, Regulators
