<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pundit.net &#187; Campaign Finance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pundit.net/tag/campaign-finance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pundit.net</link>
	<description>Politics, society, and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>John Corzine&#8217;s $131 million campaign expenditure</title>
		<link>http://pundit.net/2009/12/01/john-corzines-131-million-campaign-expenditure/</link>
		<comments>http://pundit.net/2009/12/01/john-corzines-131-million-campaign-expenditure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien Baldino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Corzine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.net/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How much would you pay to be a U.S. Senator or Governor? For John Corzine, the answer is $131 million. That includes the amount of money spent on his Senate race and two gubernoatorial campaigns. As you might recall, Corzine lost a reelection bid to Republican Chris Christie. If you take a close look at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     How much would you pay to be a U.S. Senator or Governor?  <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CAMF800&#038;show_article=1" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.breitbart.com%2Farticle.php%3Fid%3DD9CAMF800%26show_article%3D1','For+John+Corzine%2C+the+answer+is+%24131+million')">For John Corzine, the answer is $131 million</a>.  That includes the amount of money spent on his Senate race and two gubernoatorial campaigns.  As you might recall, Corzine lost a reelection bid to Republican Chris Christie.</p>
<p>     If you take a close look at the 2009 New Jersey Governor&#8217;s race, one interesting fact stands out.  Chris Christie spent $11.4 million, while John Corzine spent $27 million.  Of that $27 million, $25.3 million was his own.  Not only did he lose despite out-spending his opponent by nearly 3 to 1, but nearly 94% of his campaign was self-financed.  This tells me that he would have likely lost in a landslide if he were a man of modest means.  Actually, if he were a man of modest means, he probably wouldn&#8217;t even be looked at as a legitimate candidate.  If you don&#8217;t think so, just look at his lack of fundraising.  Most people would agree that a strong candidate also needs to be strong fundraiser.<span id="more-275"></span></p>
<p>     In a way, John Corzine&#8217;s loss is a win for those sickened by multimillionaires who try to buy elections.  <a href="http://pundit.net/2009/11/29/michael-bloombergs-expensive-purchase/" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fpundit.net%2F2009%2F11%2F29%2Fmichael-bloombergs-expensive-purchase%2F','New+York+Mayor+Michael+Bloomberg')">New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg</a> was able to purchase his recent win, but Corzine&#8217;s loss gives me hope that voters will begin to look past the glitz and money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pundit.net/2009/12/01/john-corzines-131-million-campaign-expenditure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Bloomberg&#8217;s expensive purchase</title>
		<link>http://pundit.net/2009/11/29/michael-bloombergs-expensive-purchase/</link>
		<comments>http://pundit.net/2009/11/29/michael-bloombergs-expensive-purchase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien Baldino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.net/?p=260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You often hear politicians say they want to win because of their desire to serve the public. There are a lot of ways someone can serve their community and make a huge difference. Political office is certainly one of them, or at least it can be, but helping in this capacity requires a tremendous amount [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     You often hear politicians say they want to win because of their desire to serve the public.  There are a lot of ways someone can serve their community and make a huge difference.  Political office is certainly one of them, or at least it can be, but helping in this capacity requires a tremendous amount of time and money.  At some point, even the most dedicated public servant has to wonder if the resources spent on a campaign are actually worth it.  After all, if your purpose in life is to truly serve the public, then isn&#8217;t it possible that the time and money spent to obtain office could be put to better use?  Of course it can, but I&#8217;ll assume that <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE5AR08320091128" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Farticle%2FtopNews%2FidUSTRE5AR08320091128','New+York+Mayor+Michael+Bloomberg')">New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg</a> disagrees.  </p>
<p>     After spending $74 million on his first mayoral campaign and $85 million on his second, Bloomberg went ahead and spent $102 million to win this years mayoral race.  If you&#8217;re keeping track at home, that&#8217;s a whopping <strong>$183 for each vote</strong>.  What would possess someone to do such a thing?<span id="more-260"></span></p>
<p>     Most would agree that there are a plethora of ways to improve the city outside of politics, and he&#8217;s not doing it for the money, since the job only pays <a href="http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_much_does_the_mayor_of_new_york_city_make" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.answers.com%2FQ%2FHow_much_does_the_mayor_of_new_york_city_make','%2485%2C000+annually')">$85,000 annually</a>.  That leads me to the answer that you&#8217;ve probably known all along: Ego.  A desire to see his name in the newspaper, his face on TV, and to be recognized where ever he goes.  Or perhaps the position is just a toy for the guy who has everything.</p>
<p>     Whatever Michael Bloomberg&#8217;s reason is for wanting to be Mayor, no one can deny that the campaign system is broken, and that people like him damage it further.  Michael Bloomberg also shouldn&#8217;t take too much pride in his victory.  His opponent, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/03/nyregion/03finance.html" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2009%2F10%2F03%2Fnyregion%2F03finance.html','Michael+Thompson')">Michael Thompson</a> raised a little over $8 million as of October 1st, yet despite being out-spent 13 to 1, lost by only 5 percentage points.  If Mr. Bloomberg runs for a fourth term, he&#8217;ll probably need to crack the $200 million mark to buy that election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pundit.net/2009/11/29/michael-bloombergs-expensive-purchase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

