<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pundit.net &#187; Cash For Caulkers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pundit.net/tag/cash-for-caulkers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pundit.net</link>
	<description>Politics, society, and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Another day, another stimulus package</title>
		<link>http://pundit.net/2009/12/08/another-day-another-stimulus-package/</link>
		<comments>http://pundit.net/2009/12/08/another-day-another-stimulus-package/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien Baldino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cash For Caulkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cornyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.net/?p=340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The White House has continued to claim that the $787 billion stimulus bill is a success so far. Plus, only about a third of the money has been spent, and the rate of spending is expected to pick up during the winter. If that&#8217;s the case, why do we need another stimulus bill? The next [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     The White House has continued to claim that the <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/30320.html" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2Fstories%2F1209%2F30320.html','%24787+billion+stimulus+bill')">$787 billion stimulus bill</a> is a success so far.  Plus, only about a third of the money has been spent, and the rate of spending is expected to pick up during the winter.  If that&#8217;s the case, why do we need another stimulus bill?</p>
<p>     The next stimulus would include tax breaks for small businesses, more money spent on transportation and infrastructure, and a &#8220;Cash for Caulkers&#8221; program which would stress weatherization and energy efficiency projects for homeowners.  So, how much would this cost, and how would he pay for it?<span id="more-340"></span></p>
<p>     Right now, no cost estimates have been released, but it&#8217;s safe to say it will be in the hundreds of billions.  So, how will this be paid for?  The full funding mechanism isn&#8217;t yet know, but it looks like $200 billion will be used from TARP.  So rather than return that money to reduce our massive deficit, we will keep on spending.  I think Senator John Cornyn summed it up nicely:</p>
<blockquote><p>
“Now, with unemployment at 10 percent, the President proposes another special interest slush fund using ‘savings’ from the TARP program. This is absurd,’ said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas). “TARP should be shut down as soon as possible and any unused funds should be returned to taxpayers by reducing our $1.4 trillion deficit.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pundit.net/2009/12/08/another-day-another-stimulus-package/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

