<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pundit.net &#187; Interest Rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pundit.net/tag/interest-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pundit.net</link>
	<description>Politics, society, and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:25:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Usury bill would cap credit card rates at 16% and have additional costs</title>
		<link>http://pundit.net/2009/12/02/usury-bill-would-cap-credit-card-rates-at-16-and-have-additional-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://pundit.net/2009/12/02/usury-bill-would-cap-credit-card-rates-at-16-and-have-additional-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien Baldino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.net/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[     Representatives John Tierney and Michael Capuano will be introducing a bill which would force credit card companies to cap their rates at 16%.  I know a lot of people will think this is a fantastic idea.  After all, to these people, banks are evil, and people are blameless [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     Representatives John Tierney and Michael Capuano will be introducing a bill which would force credit card companies to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE5AO4ZO20091125" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Farticle%2FpoliticsNews%2FidUSTRE5AO4ZO20091125','cap+their+rates+at+16%25')">cap their rates at 16%</a>.  I know a lot of people will think this is a fantastic idea.  After all, to these people, banks are evil, and people are blameless for their situations.  This bill embodies the bank as aggressor, borrower as victim stereotype, so it should find broad support, which is unfortunate.</p>
<p>     If borrowers make intelligent decisions, they can move their business away from high-interest credit cards to low-interest cards.  As a result, those banks with excessive rates would suffer financially.  Of course, choices would be limited for borrowers with bad credit, but whose fault is that?  The borrowers obviously, but I suspect that you won&#8217;t see many people on Capitol Hill hold individuals responsible for their decisions.  After all, many voters don&#8217;t want to hear the truth.<span id="more-287"></span></p>
<p>     By the way, I find the potential effectiveness of this bill questionable.  Since banks want to maximize their profits and those profits will be reduced by having to lower high rates, what will they do to make up for the loss in revenue?  My guess is they will raise the interest rates of those who are paying below 16%.  These people are also known as borrowers with good credit who actually pay their bills on time.  So, if you have poor credit, you&#8217;ll pay 16%.  If you have good credit, you&#8217;ll pay 16%.  Responsible borrowers can subsidize the porr decisions of the rest.  That&#8217;s fair, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pundit.net/2009/12/02/usury-bill-would-cap-credit-card-rates-at-16-and-have-additional-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can a bill to cap interest rates result in higher interest rates?</title>
		<link>http://pundit.net/2009/11/25/can-a-bill-to-cap-interest-rates-result-in-higher-interest-rates/</link>
		<comments>http://pundit.net/2009/11/25/can-a-bill-to-cap-interest-rates-result-in-higher-interest-rates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien Baldino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest Rates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.net/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[     Congress has a new idea: Pass a law that would force credit card companies to cap their rates at 16%.  I have little doubt this will will get lots of attention, and will probably pass.  On one side you have the big, evil, bail-out accepting banks, and on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     Congress has a new idea: Pass a law that would force credit card companies to <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/index.php?category=3" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.breitbart.com%2Findex.php%3Fcategory%3D3','cap+their+rates')">cap their rates</a> at 16%.  I have little doubt this will will get lots of attention, and will probably pass.  On one side you have the big, evil, bail-out accepting banks, and on the other, the hard-working American who is struggling to make ends meet in this tough economy.  That&#8217;s the way it will be presented, but it&#8217;s far from the truth.</p>
<p>     Interest rates are determined by several factors, which equate to the borrowers risk profile.  Those with excellent credit pay less than those with poor credit.  It&#8217;s a fair system, since those with poor credit are more likely to default.  For example, someone with excellent credit might pay 12%, while someone with poor credit would pay 20%.  The difference might not seem fair at first, but let&#8217;s not forget that based on their payment histories, each deserves the rate they received.<span id="more-212"></span></p>
<p>     Now, let&#8217;s take a look at what will happen if a 16% cap is placed on credit card rates.  That person who is paying 20% will likely have their rate dropped down to the 16% cap.  That is expected, but what is unknown is how the person paying 12% will be treated.  Will the banks leave their rate alone, or will they raise it a few percentage points to make up for the lost revenue on the low-end portion of their credit portfolio?  We&#8217;re talking about banks, so my guess is that we will see rates increased for everyone.  By the way, don&#8217;t think fees would be left alone.  The credit card companies will do everything in their power to maximize their profit and make up for lost revenue.</p>
<p>     This bill treats interest rates as some irrational, arbitrary number that is out of individual control.  If a consumer makes timely payments and uses credit wisely, they will receive a low rate.  It&#8217;s as simple as that.  Of course, we are living during the administration of Barack Hussein Obama, where government needs to inject itself into every aspect of our lives and make things better (by their standards).  Sure, it will result in responsible borrowers subsidizing irresponsible borrowers, but that&#8217;s ok.  Like Barack said, we need to spread the wealth around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pundit.net/2009/11/25/can-a-bill-to-cap-interest-rates-result-in-higher-interest-rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
