<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pundit.net &#187; War Tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pundit.net/tag/war-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pundit.net</link>
	<description>Politics, society, and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Not surprisingly, Nancy Pelosi favors a tax on financial transactions</title>
		<link>http://pundit.net/2009/12/03/not-surprisingly-nancy-pelosi-favors-a-tax-on-financial-transactions/</link>
		<comments>http://pundit.net/2009/12/03/not-surprisingly-nancy-pelosi-favors-a-tax-on-financial-transactions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damien Baldino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Transactions Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.net/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surprisingly, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi opposes a &#8220;war tax,&#8221; which is supported by some House members. But of course, the good news stops there. Pelosi has shown support for a financial transactions tax, which would be applied to the sale of stocks, bonds, and other investments. Nancy Pelosi believes the idea has &#8220;merit,&#8221; and would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     Surprisingly, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi opposes a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE5B240U20091203" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Farticle%2FpoliticsNews%2FidUSTRE5B240U20091203','%22war+tax%2C%22')">&#8220;war tax,&#8221;</a> which is supported by some House members.  But of course, the good news stops there.  Pelosi has shown support for a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE5B24J520091203?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=politicsNews&#038;rpc=22&#038;sp=true" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Farticle%2FpoliticsNews%2FidUSTRE5B24J520091203%3FfeedType%3DRSS%26feedName%3DpoliticsNews%26rpc%3D22%26sp%3Dtrue','financial+transactions+tax')">financial transactions tax</a>, which would be applied to the sale of stocks, bonds, and other investments.</p>
<p>     Nancy Pelosi believes the idea has &#8220;merit,&#8221; and would have a &#8220;really minimal impact on the transaction, but a tremendous impact on helping us meet our needs.&#8221;  It appears that one of those &#8220;needs&#8221; is increased spending on construction projects they hope will increase the nation&#8217;s 10.2 percent unemployment rate.<span id="more-291"></span></p>
<p>     Of course, it probably never occurred to Pelosi and company that they could free up some cash for important projects by cutting spending in other areas.  Instead, they kick around the idea of a tax that will affect the wealthy&#8230;and every American who attempts to invest their savings and get ahead.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pundit.net/2009/12/03/not-surprisingly-nancy-pelosi-favors-a-tax-on-financial-transactions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

